0
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have $n$ i.i.d. draws of $y_i$ and $x_i$ and consider a linear equation:

$$y_i =\beta_0 +\beta_1x_{1i}+...+\beta_kx_{ki}+u_i =x_i'\beta+u_i $$

A common assumption in OLS is $E[y|x]=x_i'\beta$. If this assumption fails, OLS still has a somewhat meaningful interpretation as the best linear approximation to the conditional expectation function. (With "best" being in a squared loss sense).

In LAD it is common to assume $Median[y_i|x_i]=x_i'\beta$. My question is, if the LAD assumption fails, is there a meaningful interpretation to the LAD estimates?

I tried fiddling around with the triangle inequality but made minimal progress, and am skeptical there is a meaningful interpretation.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

It can be shown that LAD (and more generally quantile regression) minimizes a weighted expectation of the squared specification error, $(X_i \beta_\tau-Q_\tau(Y_i |X_i))^2$, where $Q_\tau(Y_i |X_i)$ is the $\tau$th quantile of the conditional distribution fucntion and $\beta_\tau$ is the estimate from quantile regression.

Theorems 1 and 2 of Angrist, Chernozhukov, and Fernandez-Val (2006) is the citation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.