I am using Stata with a simple dataset to do very basic regressions and comparing with SPSS to see if the results are the same, but they're not. I'm close, the significance are slightly the same, while the magnitudes of the betas are completely different. The data was copy and pasted into each from an Excel. can anyone help?
[![SPSS Regression Result][1]][1]
REGRESSION /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT ETR /METHOD=ENTER Leverage lnAssets Capitalintensive ROA ESG LnGdp.
Var. | Unst.B | Std.Err. | St.B | t | Sig.
(Constant) | 0.275 | 0.019 | | 14.578 | .000
Leverage | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.058 | -6.825 | .000
Ln Assets| 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.025 | -2.531 | .011
caoitalINt| 0.028 | 0.005 | 0.046 | 5.628 | .000
ROA | -0.007 | 0.000 | -0.277 | -31.879 | .000
Esg | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.058 | 6.549 | .000
Ln GDP| 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.045 | 5.490 | .000
Stata Regression Result
. reg etr esg leverage lnassets capitalintensive roa lngdp
[![Stata Regression Result][2]][2]
ETR | Coef. | Std.Err. | t | P>|t|
ESG | .0003697 | .0000564 | 6.55 | 0.000
Leverage |-.0004685 | .0000685 | -6.84 | 0.000
Ln Assets |-.0026387 | .0010409 | -2.54 | 0.011
CapitalIntensive| .0276779 | .0049454 | 5.60 | 0.000
ROA |-.0074588 | .0002338 | -31.91| 0.000
Ln GDP| .0067168 | .0012215 | 5.50 | 0.000
_cons | .2750809 | .0188432 | 14.60 | 0.000
reg etr esg leverage lnassets capitalintensive roa lngdp, beta
in Stata and compare again (the columnBeta
). $\endgroup$