I am trying to find out what is the effect of activities(like jumping, weight lifting etc.) on behavior (such as attitude towards participating in a marathon). (sample size of 60 observations for each variable)
I have 10 different activities coded as 1-participated, 0-did not participate. Based on these I also created a composite variable that measures exposure to the activities.
When I run a regression for the exposure it shows no effects which is fine. However now I want to dive deeper and find out whether one or more of the 10 activities might actually have an effect on future behavior.
But when I run multivaried regression with 10 activities the model is not significant and none of the coefficients is significant either. However when I run 10 simpler regressions I find that some of the activities have significant effect (both coefficient and R2). A similar thing happens when I take 3-4 activities with lowest p scores and run another multivaried regression with only those 3-4 variables, then some of them show significant effects.
So my question is, how should I approach this? Is it okay to just compare simple regressions in this case?