2
$\begingroup$

For $\hat{\theta}_n = \theta + O_p(n^{-1/2})$ we have $$\hat{\theta}_n - \theta = O_p(n^{-1/2})$$

Therefore, we have for any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a finite $M > 0$ and finite $N > 0$ such that for all $n > N$,

$$P\left(|\sqrt{n}(\hat{\theta}_n-\theta)| > M\right) < \epsilon$$ The above means that $\sqrt{n} (\hat{\theta}_n -\theta)$ is bounded in probability.

However, what exactly does $\hat{\theta}_n - \theta = O_p(n^{-1/2})$ mean in words? Is it that "the difference between $\hat{\theta}_n$ and $\theta_n$ is diminishing at rate $n^{-1/2}$"?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

I like to view this intuitively in terms of quantiles. Then the notation for 'probability distributions' becomes exactly the same as 'regular' Landau-notation.

The expression $P\left(|\sqrt{n}(\hat{\theta}_n-\theta)| > M\right) < \epsilon$ means also that the $\epsilon$-th quantile $Q_{\epsilon}( \vert\hat{\theta}_n-\theta\vert)$ of the distribution of $\vert \hat{\theta}_n-\theta \vert $ is smaller than or equal to $M \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}$ at least for some sufficiently large $n>N$. And this is true for every quantile $\epsilon$.

The difference with small $o$ notation is that small-$o$ is independent of $M$. For every $M$ there will be some large enough $n>N$ such that the quantile is smaller.

With $O(f(n))$ we get that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{Q_{\epsilon}( \vert\hat{\theta}_n-\theta\vert)}{f(n)} \leq M$. With $o(f(n))$ we get that $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{Q_{\epsilon}( \vert\hat{\theta}_n-\theta\vert)}{f(n)} = 0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. So is it correct to say anything related to $\sqrt{n}$ as a rate in the interpretation? $\endgroup$
    – Adrian
    Commented May 6, 2022 at 17:08
1
$\begingroup$

It depends on what you are referring to with "the difference between $\hat \theta_n$ and $\theta_n$".

Intuitively, it means that the larger $n$ becomes, the less likely it is that the difference is not less than proportional to $n^{-1/2}$. But there could always be cases where this is not true, it's only that they get exceedingly unlikely.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.