Background
Suppose we have a box of resistors. The manufacturer rates these resistors at 100 ohms, but they have some variability. Let $x$ be the true resistance of a resistor chosen from the box at random. Suppose
$$ x \sim N(\mu,\sigma^2) $$
We have an ohmmeter that can measure the resistance of the selected resistor. Denote the measurement of the resistor as $y=x+\epsilon$, where $$\epsilon \sim N(0,\delta^2)$$
In the textbook I'm studying, they have the expression $$ Q = E\left[(x-\hat{x})^2|y\right] $$ where $\hat{x}$ is an estimate for the true resistance $x$.
The goal is to take the derivative of $Q$ with respect to $\hat{x}$ and set to zero to find the optimum estimate $\hat{x}$. I was working out the details for this derivative/expectation and found that the "Law of the Unconscious Statistician" might be useful. I tried applying this law and ran into the conditional distribution $f_{x|y}(x|y)=f(x,y)/f(y)$. Then I realized I wasn't sure what $f(y)$ was exactly.
Question
My question is regarding how to describe the distribution of the measurement $y$. If we think of all possible measurements of all possible resistors from the box, I think we would write
$$ y \sim N(\mu,\sigma^2+\delta^2) $$
However, if we are thinking of the possible measurements for a single, randomly selected resistor with true resistance $x$, then we would write
$$ y\sim N(x,\delta^2) $$
Which distribution for $y$ do I care about when I'm trying to find the conditional distribution $f(x|y)$? And is there better notation to use so that I can avoid this confusion?