1
$\begingroup$

Suppose a discrete random distribution $X$ which takes integer values in some small (but not binary) range, e.g. $[0, 255]$ and whose true pmf is unknown (however, the null hypothesis is that it is uniform). If I draw a large sample $\{x\}$ from this distribution, I can estimate the pmf by counting the number of $x_i$ that take each value and dividing by the total. But if I draw another large sample, I will most likely get a different estimate.

I'd like some way of characterizing the uncertainty in each point in the pmf, ideally one that can be updated as I (that is, the computer) continually draws new samples.

"Confidence intervals for empirical CDF" looks closely related to what I'm trying to do but AFAICT only applies to continuous distributions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see where the DKW inequality is limited to continuous distributions based on the wikipedia article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – soakley May 7 '13 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ The linked question made it sound like it was only good for continuous distributions, but I've now done a little more digging and it isn't: for instance Massart's "The Tight Constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz Inequality" is mostly over my head, but does explicitly show that the inequality is valid for discrete distributions. $\endgroup$ – zwol May 7 '13 at 16:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.