I am having trouble to interpret tukey's post hoc result from the following
They incorporated post-hoc test results into a table using the πβ€π<π style notation (π,π,π,... correspond to groups) but how to interpret it?
- Is
Normal > osteopenic, osteoporotic
meansNormal
has higher significant difference thanosteopenic and osteoporotic
? - In R, the results look like the following, is that mean
Neutral
has higher significant difference thanFriends
? more specifically how to I write this result in πβ€π<π style notation?
Thanks!
Neutral
,Friends
, and so on. ... Some software will report a positive mean difference when the values in the first group are larger, and a negative mean difference when the values in the second group are larger. However, since this function in R is reporting all the mean differences as positive, I suspect this function is not following that convention. $\endgroup$