Say we want to fit some model to predict $\mathbf{E}(A | B)$, which is the expected value for some distribution (ex. Poisson).
What would be the benefit/loss of fitting this vs. computing $\mathbf{E}(A | C) * P(C | B)$ for some variable $C$, where we can fit both $\mathbf{E}(A | C)$ and $P(C | B)$ separately? Intuitively, I think if we get unbiased estimates for $\mathbf{E}(A | C)$ and $P(C | B)$, we should get an unbiased estimate for $\mathbf{E}(A | B)$. However, the variance in predictions may be significantly different, considering how well $\mathbf{E}(A | C)$ and $P(C | B)$ are fit and what each's variance and accuracy is.