Suppose two groups on treatment and can be modelled by a Weibull distribution with a normal probability density function

\begin{align} f(x; \alpha, \lambda) = \alpha \lambda x^{\alpha - 1}e^{-\lambda x^{\alpha}}, \quad \text{where } x \geq \alpha \; \text{and } \lambda > 0 \end{align}

Where in the study $n_1$ participants are assigned to treatment 1, $x_i$, and $n_2$ participants are assigned to treatment 2, $y_j$. We assume $\alpha$ is known but not necessarily equal to 1. Group $X_i$ has a Weibull distribution with pdf $f(x_i; \alpha_1, \lambda_1)$ and group $y_j$ has a Weibull distribution with pdf $f(y_j; \alpha_2, \lambda_2)$.

Derive the likelihood equations and solve to find the MLEs of $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_1$


Obtaining the joint likelihood distribution for both groups, $x_i$ and $y_j$, with sample $(x_1, x_2,...x_i, y_1, y_2,..., y_j)$ to obtain allows for the likelihood equation which depends on parameters $(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)$ to look like the following be as follows:

\begin{align*} L(\lambda_1, \lambda_2) &= L_{1}(\lambda_1) \cdot L_{2}(\lambda_2) \\ &= \prod_{i = 1}^{n}(\alpha_1\lambda_{1}x_i^{\alpha_i - 1}e^{-\lambda_1 x_i^{\alpha_1}}) \cdot \prod_{j = 1}^{n}(\alpha_2\lambda_{2}y_j^{\alpha_2 - 1}e^{-\lambda_1 y_j^{\alpha_2}}) \\ &= \alpha_1^{n_1}\lambda_1^{n_1}\prod_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1 - 1}e^{-\lambda_1 \sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1}} \cdot \alpha_2^{n_2}\lambda_2^{n_2}\prod_{j = 1}^{n}y_j^{\alpha_2 - 1} e^{-\lambda_2 \sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_j^{\alpha_2}} \end{align*}

This produces the following log-likelihood

\begin{align} \ell(\lambda_1, \lambda_2) = n_1\ln(\lambda_1) + n_2\ln(\lambda_2) - \lambda_1\sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1} -\lambda_2\sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_j^{\alpha_2} \end{align}

The partial derivatives for $\lambda_1, \lambda_2$

For $\lambda_1$:

\begin{align} \frac{\partial{\ell(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}}{\partial{\lambda_1}} = \frac{n_1}{\lambda_1} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1} \end{align}

For $\lambda_2$:

\begin{align} \frac{\partial{\ell(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}}{\partial{\lambda_2}} = \frac{n_2}{\lambda_2} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_j^{\alpha_2} \end{align}

My question.

From here, do I set the equations equal to 0 and solve independently for each to obtain $\hat{\lambda}_1, \hat{\lambda}_1$ or do I solve by setting both equal to 0 and solving in terms of each other.

For example independently: For $\lambda_1$:

\begin{align*} 0 &= \frac{\partial\ell(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}{\partial\lambda_1} \\ 0 &= \frac{n_1}{\lambda_1} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1} \\ \hat{\lambda_1} &= \frac{n_1}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1}} \end{align*}

For $\lambda_2$: \begin{align*} 0 &= \frac{\partial\ell(\lambda_1, \lambda_2)}{\partial\lambda_1} \\ 0 &= \frac{n_2}{\lambda_2} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_j^{\alpha_2} \\ \hat{\lambda_2} &= \frac{n_2}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} y_j^{\alpha_2}} \end{align*}

Solving together:

For $\lambda_1$:

\begin{align} \hat{\lambda}_{1} = \frac{n_1\lambda_2}{\lambda_2\left(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1} -\sum_{i = 1}^{n}y_j^{\alpha_2} \right) + n_2} \end{align}

For $\lambda_2$:

\begin{align} \hat{\lambda}_{2} = \frac{n_2\lambda_1}{\lambda_1\left(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_i^{\alpha_1} -\sum_{i = 1}^{n}y_j^{\alpha_2} \right) + n_1} \end{align}

Thank you for your help. This might be a trivial question but I would also like to understand why.


1 Answer 1


We want to solve for the MLEs in terms of the known parameters and the data, so you should solve independently for each $\hat\lambda$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.