The canonical paper here was
Wilk, M.B. and R. Gnanadesikan. 1968. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55: 1-17
and it still repays close and repeated reading.
A lucid treatment with many good examples was given by
Cleveland, W.S. 1993. Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
and it is worth mentioning the more introductory
Cleveland, W.S. 1994. The Elements of Graphing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.
Other texts containing reasonable exposure to this approach include
Davison, A.C. 2003. Statistical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, J.A. 2007. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
That aside, I don't know of anything that is quite what you ask. Once you have seen the point of quantile-quantile plots, showing in detail that histograms are a second-rate alternative seems neither interesting nor useful, too much like shooting fish in a barrel.
But I would summarize like this:
Binning suppresses details, and the details are often important. This can apply not only to exactly what is going on in the tails but also to what is going on in the middle. For example, granularity or multimodality may be important as well as skewness or tail weight.
Binning requires decisions about bin origin and bin width, which can affect the appearance of histograms mightily, so it is hard to see what is real and what is a side-effect of choices. If your software makes these decisions for you, the problems remain. (For example, default bin choices are often designed so that you do not use "too many bins", i.e. with the motive of smoothing a little.)
The graphical and psychological problem of comparing two histograms is trickier than that of judging the fit of a set of points to a straight line.
[Added 27 Sept 2017] 4. Quantile plots can be varied very easily when considering one or more transformed scales. By transformation here I mean a nonlinear transformation, not e.g. scaling by a maximum or standardisation by (value $-$ mean) / SD. If the quantiles are just the order statistics, then all you need to do is to apply the transformation, as e.g. the logarithm of the maximum is identically the maximum of the logarithms, and so forth. (Trivially, reciprocation reverses order.) Even if you plot selected quantiles that are based on two order statistics, usually they are just interpolated between two original data values and the effect of the interpolation is trivial. In contrast, histograms on log or other transformed scales require a fresh decision on bin origin and width that isn't especially difficult, but it is not trivial. Much the same can be said of density estimation as a way to summarize the distribution.