Say I have three matrices $\mathbf{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times m}$ and $\mathbf{A}, \mathbf{B} \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ with $\operatorname{rank}(\mathbf{A}) \leq r$ and $\mathbf{B}$ is unconstrained on rank. I also assume that all of them are bounded in Frobenius norm by some number say $\Vert\mathbf{W}\Vert_F, \Vert\mathbf{A}\Vert_F, \Vert\mathbf{B}\Vert_F \leq \kappa$
I am trying to show that $ \sup \Vert\mathbf{WA} \Vert_F \leq \sup \Vert\mathbf{WB}\Vert_F$ (sup is over the three matrices)
My idea is blend SVD decomposition and the fact that the Frobenius norm of a matrix is the squared singular values and hence LHS would be cropped as only $r$ singular values would contribute to the sum. But I can't make it formal. Do you have any hints on how to proceed?
——— Edit post @whuber comment!
OK. This was question was actually not posed correctly at all sorry. What I am looking is not really to simply show that $ \sup \Vert\mathbf{WA} \Vert_F \leq \sup \Vert\mathbf{WB}\Vert_F$ but rather to find the separating factor based on the ranked (A) vs. full ranked (B) constraint. So basically looking a result like;
$$ \sup \Vert\mathbf{WA} \Vert_F \leq \textrm{some function of} (r, \kappa) \\ \sup \Vert\mathbf{WB} \Vert_F \leq \textrm{some function of} (m, \kappa) $$
Happy to get any pointers! Thanks again :)