0
$\begingroup$

I want to predict the change in my dependent variable (DV) over time using an independent variable (measured only at baseline). My DV was measured at three points in time. The easiest way would be to calculate a change score for my DV by subtracting DV_t3 - DV_t1. However, with this approach, I would be “throwing away” the information about my DV at t2. I wonder if there is a way to include this information in my analysis?

Here's a dummy dataset (just for visualization purposes):

Subject_id IV_t1 DV_t1 DV_t2 DV_t3
Subject_1 0.17 0.3 0.01 0.95
Subject_2 0.86 0.62 0.39 0.4
Subject_3 0.39 0.23 0.3 0.51
Subject_4 0.93 0.86 0.76 0.03
Subject_5 0.17 0.87 0.77 0

Possibly related (but referring to ANOVA / categorical IV):

Best model for change in scores over three time points

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Chapter 7 of Frank Harrell's Regression Modeling Strategies discusses longitudinal data like yours. It's often not a good idea to model change scores directly. Then you are also throwing out the information about DV_t1 values and are assuming that the change is independent of that value.

You can instead fit the model with the DV values in their original scale. It's often a good idea to use DV_t1 as a predictor along with IV_t1 as you model of DV_t2 andDV_t3. Instead of a single change (analogous to a paired t-test and throwing out DV_t2) to try to handle intra-individual correlations, you use all of the observations and handle those correlations with generalized least squares (as Harrell would probably recommend here), or with a mixed model. After you've built that model, you can always use the model results to show the changes over time.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Very interesting, thanks! A colleague of mine argued very similarly pointing to this article: academic.oup.com/ije/article/51/5/1604/6294759. So you would include DV_t1 as a covariate, and calculate two regressions on DV_t2 and DV_t3 separately? Or should I include a time interaction here? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 18 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ @JohannesWiesner the Harrell reference goes into more detail than is possible here. You would at least include a binary time indicator (whether the observation is for t2 or t3) as a predictor. If you think that the association of your IV (or any other precictor) with outcome differs between those times, then include an interaction between the predictor and that time indicator. $\endgroup$
    – EdM
    Commented Jul 18 at 15:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.