I am trying to find a name for the kind of study design/analysis I am working on so I can use it to look up best practices and examples of people who have done this kind of thing well.

Essentially I am trying to retrospectively compare two ways of taking biopsies of an organ. Since we are taking biopsies, we assume that the PPV of each test is 100%, so the question is simply "does biopsy method A find more cancer than biopsy method B?"

We have lots of examples of biopsy method B but only a few of A, so we would like to take patients who got biopsy type A and match them to one or more patients who got biopsy type B based on basic demographic information and risk factors for the disease before doing the comparison.

This sounds a bit like a case-control study, but it's not quite. Is there a name for what I am trying to do here? Can anyone point me to a paper that talks about or uses this kind of design?


Do you know about 'propensity score matching'? I think it does what you want.

Here is an example https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223906464_Family_Group_Decision_Making_a_propensity_score_analysis_to_evaluate_child_and_family_services_at_baseline_and_after_36-months


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.