It seems to me that normalized ERR (Expected Reciprocal Ranking) scores (ERR scores of your ranking algorithm divided by ERR score calculated for the ground truth ranking) are more useful than the unscaled ERR scores, but I have not seen normalized scores being reported in the literature. Is there a good reason that the ERR scores are reported in raw rather than normalized format?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.