From Bayes' theorem, the posterior is proportional to the prior $\times$ the likelihood.
That is,
$$P(a|E,d,b)\propto P(E|a) P(a|d,b)$$
(which you should be able to show for yourself). When you take the product and collect like terms, you get something that will be a density for $a$, up to a multiplicative constant.
If you simplify that result and can recognize that density (I call it playing 'spot the density'), you can identify the parameters of the density you recognize and so work out the constant required to make it a density, at which point you have the complete posterior density.
In this case it has a nice simple form, that of a density I can say with some certainty you're already aware of.
Since the OP has clearly got the complete answer I will outline an approach to this question for future reference. (It's possible to do it a bit more formally than this.)
\begin{eqnarray}
P(a|E,d,b)&\propto& P(E|a) P(a|d,b)\quad \text{ (from Bayes' Theorem)}\\
&\propto& a\exp(−aE) \cdot b^da^{d−1}\exp(−ba)/\Gamma(d)\\
&\propto& a^{d}\exp(−\{b+E\}a)\\
&\propto& a^{d^*-1}\exp(−b^*a)
\end{eqnarray}
where $d^* = d+1$ and $b^*=b+E$. This is clearly of the same gamma form that we started with in the prior, but with different shape and rate parameters.
If required, it's a simple matter to write down the constants needed to make it a proper density.
self-study
tag. If it applies (if, for example, this is work for some subject), could you add the tag to your post (I suggest removing theparameterization
tag). $\endgroup$