14
$\begingroup$

I'd like to estimate the correlation between:

An ordinal variable: subjects are asked to rate their preference for 6 types of fruit on a 1-5 scale (ranging from very disgusting to very tasty) On average subjects use only 3 points of the scale.

A continuous variable: the same subjects are asked to quickly identify these fruits, which results in an mean accuracy for the 6 fruits.

Is Spearman rho the best method to analyze these data and/or are there other good methods I could consider?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to the list. The ordinal variable looks like it is actually 6 variables (one for each fruit). It's also not clear to me how the identification variable is created, nor that it is continuous. $\endgroup$ – Peter Flom - Reinstate Monica Dec 4 '13 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks thats quick! So for each subject I indeed have 6 preference ratings, and 6 accuracy ratings. Accuracy is the mean hitrate over 16 identification trials (16 for each type of fruit). A hit is when they select the right fruit, miss is when they select the wrong type of fruit. Hope that this made it more clear. $\endgroup$ – San Dec 4 '13 at 13:04
7
$\begingroup$

You could use Spearman's, which is based on ranks and therefore OK for ordinal data. You would then have six results.

If you want to take a different approach, you could get complex and look at a multilevel model, with subject being repeated. It sounds like "accuracy" would depend on "preference". So, a mixed model could look at that and account for the non-independence of the data. But, as noted, that's a much more complex model to implement.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.