The characteristic function of Fisher $\mathcal{F}(1,\alpha)$ distribution is: $$C(t)=\frac{\Gamma \left(\frac{\alpha +1}{2}\right) U\left(\frac{1}{2},1-\frac{\alpha }{2},-i t \alpha \right)}{\Gamma \left(\frac{\alpha }{2}\right)}$$ where $U$ is the confluent hypergeometric function. I am trying to solve the inverse Fourier transform $\mathcal {F} _ {t,x}^{-1}$ of the $n$-convolution to recover the density of a variable $x$, that is: $$\mathcal {F} _ {t,x}^{-1} \left(C(t)^n\right)$$ with the purpose of getting the distribution of the sum of $n$ Fisher-distributed random variables. I wonder if someone has any idea as it seems to be very difficult to solve. I tried values of $\alpha=3$ and $n=2$ to no avail. Note: for $n=2$ by convolution I get the pdf of the average (not sum):

$$\frac{3 \left(12 \left(x^2+3\right) \left(5 x^2-3\right) x^2+9 \left(20 x^4+27 x^2+9\right) \log \left(\frac{4 x^2}{3}+1\right)+2 \sqrt{3} \left(x^2+15\right) \left(4 x^2+3\right) x^3 \tan ^{-1}\left(\frac{2 x}{\sqrt{3}}\right)\right)}{\pi ^2 x^3 \left(x^2+3\right)^3 \left(4 x^2+3\right)}$$,

where $x$ is an average of 2 variables. I know it is unwieldy but would love to get an idea of the approximation of the basin distribution.


There is no closed-form density for a convolution of F-statistics, so trying to invert the characteristic function analytically is not likely to lead to anything useful.

In mathematical statistics, the tilted Edgeworth expansion (also known as the saddlepoint approximation) is a famous and often used technique for approximating a density function given the characteristic function. The saddlepoint approximation if often remarkably accurate. Ole Barndorff-Nielsen and David Cox wrote a textbook explaining this mathematical technique.

There are other ways to approach the problem without using the characteristic function. One would expect the convolution distribution to be something like an F-distribution in shape. One might try an approximation like $aF(n,k)$ for the $n$-convolution, and then choose $a$ and $k$ to make the first two moments of the distribution correct. This is easy given the known mean and variance of the F-distribution.

If $\alpha$ is large, then the convolution converges to a chisquare distribution on $n$ degrees of freedom. This is equivalent to choosing $a=n$ and $k=\infty$ in the above approximation, showing that the simple approximation is accurate for large $\alpha$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.