2
$\begingroup$

I'm using SPSS to perform TwoStep cluster analyses. SPSS shows predictor importance of each variable used in an analysis. Oftentimes, a binary variable like gender (sorry, I'm just keeping it simple!) will be the most important variable to the formation of the clusters, even if you don't want it to be.

Is there a way to weight variables, so that maybe I can downplay, but not eliminate, gender's role in the analysis?

Thank you for the help!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This might be a duplicate of this question, but as it's been voted up once already, I'm choosing not to flag it for moderator attention. You might want to take a look and see if you can distinguish your question meaningfully from the other one. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 4, 2014 at 1:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ downplay, but not eliminate, gender's role in the analysis This request is contradictory and strange in itself unless you specify the degree to what downplay gender's role. $\endgroup$
    – ttnphns
    Commented Jan 4, 2014 at 8:39

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

One thing to keep in mind before turning to weights is that gender can be considered a "swamping" variable in a two-step cluster analysis. Differences between gender are oftentimes large, and thus overpower weaker, but still substantively interesting heterogeneity in your data.

Instead of down-weighting gender, you could consider looking into a finite mixture regression model. Finite mixture models are a model-based cluster analysis (clusters are usually assumed to be multivariate Gaussian) and a finite mixture regression model essentially combines a cluster analysis with a regression. In your case, you could use gender as a predictor, perform this analysis, and detect clusters while taking into account the predictive power of gender (as well as other variables of interest). More information can be found here and here in the flexmix R package documentation.

$\endgroup$
0
2
$\begingroup$

@FranckDernoncourt has given a useful answer to a very similar question, and @ttnphns made some other useful comments on that question that you should check out. Their suggestions include changing your variables' scales, propagating the variables, and checking out this book. (Please comment or edit yourself if this summary of the already-available suggestions can be improved!)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.