0
$\begingroup$

I had to standardize the scores of a variable because the items composing it were measured on different Likert-type scales (5, 6, 7 points). After this, I ran a correlation between this variable and other variables, with which theoretically it is supposed to correlate negatively. This yielded though a positive correlation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this result due to the score standardization? Thank you!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you say you 'standardized the scores of a variable' do you mean you standardized the components before adding them, or you standardized the result after adding them? $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Jan 5, 2014 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ The scores were standardized before adding them. $\endgroup$
    – andree
    Commented Jan 5, 2014 at 23:18

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

No, it can't be due to score standardization, unless the standardization somehow involved multiplying by a negative number. I can't see why standardization would involve that, but you never know!

More usually, the standardization would be something like:

$S = 7/5*A + 6/5*B + C$

as opposed to

$S = A + B + C$

these two S will correlate very highly with each other and in the same direction with some other variable.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, it could not have been standardization, thank you! Actually, I just realized it's a coding problem.. which is an entirely different problem. $\endgroup$
    – andree
    Commented Jan 5, 2014 at 23:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.