4
$\begingroup$

I don't know if this belongs here or in StackExchange, it is a mixed but probably pretty simple question. How do I normally report a Likelihood Ratio Test? I would love a good reference in your answer, I have searched but could not find any good answers.

> glmm0 <- glmer(yngel ~ (1|nest), data, family=poisson(link="log"))
> glmm <- glmer(yngel ~ age.level + (1|nest) + 0, data, family=poisson(link="log"))
> anova(glmm0, glmm)
Data: data
Models:
glmm0: yngel ~ (1 | nest)
glmm: yngel ~ age.level + (1 | nest) + 0
      Df    AIC    BIC  logLik deviance  Chisq Chi Df Pr(>Chisq)    
glmm0  2 682.33 689.38 -339.16   678.33                             
glmm   3 672.37 682.95 -333.18   666.37 11.959      1   0.000544 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

My best guess so far is: I used likelihood ratio test to compare the model with the fixed effect to a model without it. The model including the fixed effect (age-level) was a better fit ($\chi^2(df=?)=11.96$, $p=0.00054$).

And I cannot actually figure out how many df to report from that. The there is 2 for one model and 3 for the other, and 1 between them.

Thank you for your help.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Any guesses on what the "Chi Df" column is about? $\endgroup$
    – John
    Feb 13 '14 at 21:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "How do I report a likelihood ratio test?" belongs here (though I am not sure where else you meant - here is part of stackexchange; were you referring to stackoverflow perhaps?). The df for the chi-square test is the "1" in the table that's right beside the p-value. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Feb 13 '14 at 21:57
6
$\begingroup$

For a likelihood ratio test, the degrees of freedom are equal to the difference in number of parameters for the two models. In this case, df = 1, and so $\chi^2(1)=11.96$, $p=0.0005$.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks (+1). If I perform (for consitency) a LRT on linear models (lm) where do I find the χ2 value? Is it the value given under Sum of Sq? $\endgroup$
    – bee guy
    Dec 22 '17 at 8:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can compare two linear models using the anova() function, so anova(mod1, mod2). The X^2 value is under the "Chisq" column, much like the output in the original question $\endgroup$
    – dmartin
    Dec 23 '17 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ Hi dmartin, I don't obtain a X^2 value when I run anova(mod1, mod2) on linear models (without random effects). This returns an F-statistic. Even if I run anova(mod1, mod2, test = "Chisq"), I don't see a column Chisq, but a column Sum of sq. $\endgroup$
    – bee guy
    Mar 12 '18 at 8:40
  • $\begingroup$ Is the absolute value of this the difference in sum of squares the X^2 value? $\endgroup$
    – bee guy
    Mar 12 '18 at 8:46
  • $\begingroup$ I actually think I might have been mistaken, as anova for a chi-square seems to only work with models that return deviance (like glm). You might try something like lrtest for what you want to do: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/6505/… $\endgroup$
    – dmartin
    Mar 12 '18 at 15:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.