3
$\begingroup$

I want to find the relationship between two variables and a third. For example, in the graph below I have the total number of questions a student has completed on the x axis, the number of questions they have completed in a particular subtopic on the y-axis and the average score displayed using color. I can't post company data without permission, so I have posted random data instead. But I have found that these kind of graphs don't really help that much. Are there any other kinds of graphs that will visually represent the dependence between two factors in terms of their effective on the third

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
5
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Can you add that graph into your question? $\endgroup$ Mar 4, 2014 at 23:47
  • $\begingroup$ @AndreSilva: Unfortunately, I can't post company data without permission $\endgroup$
    – Casebash
    Mar 6, 2014 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ Did I guess the scatterplot setup correctly anyway? Any modifications worth making? $\endgroup$ Mar 6, 2014 at 11:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AndreSilva: Here's a graph with random data $\endgroup$
    – Casebash
    Mar 12, 2014 at 10:45
  • $\begingroup$ Effect of which two variables on which third? $\endgroup$ Mar 12, 2014 at 16:30

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I'm imagining your scatterplot has average score in a subtopic as the $x$ axis, and number of questions as the $y$ axis, with two different colors for observations of these two $y$ variables (e.g., black $=$ overall.count, red $=$ sub.count). If you want to visualize the bivariate relationships between score and your two number of questions variables, try Poisson regression. Here's an example in R:

library(ggplot2) #loads plotting package; use install.packages('ggplot2') if you haven't yet.
dataset=data.frame(score=rnorm(100,60,15),      #some random continuous data: x̄ = 60, SD = 15
overall.count=rpois(100,lambda=35),sub.count=rpois(100,lambda=10)) #random counts: x̄  = 35/10

summary(glm(overall.count~score,family='poisson',data=dataset)) #1-Overall Poisson regression
summary(glm(sub.count~score,family='poisson',data=dataset))    #2-Subtopic Poisson regression

ggplot(dataset,aes(x=score,y=overall.count,z=sub.count))+                  #calls scatterplot
geom_point(aes(x=score,y=overall.count))+geom_point(aes(x=score,y=sub.count),colour='red')+
geom_smooth(formula=y~x,method='glm',family='poisson',colour='black')+   #plots regression #1
geom_smooth(formula=z~x,method='glm',family='poisson',colour='red')+     #plots regression #2
scale_y_continuous('number of questions')                                    #relabels y axis

Here's what that produces:


The regression lines are flat, which is no surprise, as these are random data. The grey spaces are confidence bands. Altogether, there's little doubt that the relationships are very weak here. Compare:

ggplot(data.frame(lapply(dataset,sort)),aes(x=score,y=overall.count,z=sub.count))+    #sorted
geom_point(aes(x=score,y=overall.count))+geom_point(aes(x=score,y=sub.count),colour='red')+
geom_smooth(formula=y~x,method='glm',family='poisson',colour='black')+   #plots regression #1
geom_smooth(formula=z~x,method='glm',family='poisson',colour='red')+     #plots regression #2
scale_y_continuous('number of questions')                                    #relabels y axis

Here's what that produces:

Clearly more related, no?

This time there's a positive relationship by construction: I sorted the random data from low to high. You definitely don't want to do that – I only did for the sake of demonstration. In this case, you can see a little curve to the relationship too. If you want a numeric representation of that curvature, fit a quadratic (or even higher-degree polynomial) regression model. Here's code for a quadratic Poisson regression:

summary(glm(sub.count~scale(score,scale=F)+      #centered for nonessential multicollinearity
I(scale(score,scale=F)^2),family='poisson',data=dataset)) #adds the squared term to the model

Once again, I don't know if centering is really helpful in the above. It doesn't change the predictions, but it changes the linear coefficient, its $SE$, and its significance, and I'm not sure if the changes are good. Hopefully it won't matter for you, but I'll be happy to edit if anyone knows whether to center here. Also, if residuals are heteroscedastic (they look like they might be here, judging by a plot I haven't included), you may want robust standard errors (see "When to use robust standard errors in Poisson regression?"), or you may want negative binomial regression instead of Poisson.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer because I just realised that having performance bands might help me for representing some relationships. But what I'm actually looking for is graphical methods of representing the effects of both variables simultaneously, not individually. I don't know the proper statistical term for this $\endgroup$
    – Casebash
    Mar 12, 2014 at 11:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Seems you want multiple-regression. $\endgroup$ Mar 12, 2014 at 16:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.