I've made a logistic regression model that includes a polynomial term to degree 2. I'm aware that logistic regression models the response variable as a non-linear function of the predictors. Does it make sense to include a polynomial term in logistic regression?


1 Answer 1


Logistic regression models the log odds of a "1" or "success" response as a linear function of the regression coefficients (i.e. the parameters), but there's no need to insist that the log odds be a linear function of predictors.

[This model is linear in parameters & the predictor: $$\operatorname{logit}\pi_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_i$$ This one is linear in only the parameters: $$\operatorname{logit}\pi_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_i + \beta_2 x_i^2$$ ]

Just as with ordinary least-squares regression, polynomial predictor terms can be used if required by theory or simply to allow for curvature in empirical models.

  • $\begingroup$ Correct me if I'm wrong, but the formula to convert predicted values from log odds to probabilities (values between 0-1) is non-linear. So doesn't logistic regression already allow for curvature? $\endgroup$
    – luciano
    Mar 31, 2014 at 14:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ luciano: If you want to think of it in terms of the probability; then yes, its a curved relationship, but still restricted in form - rotational symmetry around the point of inflection at the inflection point at $\pi=\frac{1}{2}$ - you can only shift or stretch the logistic curve when you fit the two parameters. Polynomials allow more flexibility. See @gung's link for an example. $\endgroup$ Mar 31, 2014 at 14:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.