The authors are providing a simple means for estimating the parameters of a mean-reverting Orstein-Uhlenbeck process via a regression on returns at discretized points in time.
The model they are considering has a representation as a stochastic differential equation of the form [pg. 16, Eq. (12)]
$$
\newcommand{\rd}{\mathrm{d}}
\rd X(t) = \kappa (m - X(t)) \rd t + \sigma \rd W(t)
$$
where $W(t)$ is a standard Brownian motion.
The solution to this SDE is well-known and easy to find via Ito's lemma and an analogous technique to integrating constants in ODEs. The solution is [pg. 17, Eq. (13)]
$$
X(t_0 + \Delta t) = e^{-\kappa \Delta t} X(t_0) + (1-e^{-\kappa \Delta t}) m + \sigma \int_{t_0}^{\,t_0 + \Delta t} e^{-\kappa(t_0+\Delta t - s)} \, \rd W(s) .
$$
This is a Gaussian process and so is characterized by its mean and covariance as a function of time. Letting "time go to infinity" (i.e., $\Delta t \to \infty$), we get an equilibrium mean and variance of
$$
\begin{aligned}
\mathbb{E} X(t) &= m \\
\mathbb{V}\mathrm{ar}(X(t)) &= \frac{\sigma^2}{2 \kappa}
\end{aligned}
$$
Now, skipping to the appendix [bottom of page 45], the authors are trying to estimate the parameters by doing a regression using the discrete values of the process and model
$$
X_{n+1} = a + b X_n + \zeta_{n+1} .
$$
Matching up the parameters $a$ and $b$ with the portions from above, we get that
$$
\begin{aligned}
a &= m (1 - e^{-\kappa \Delta t}) \\
b &= e^{-\kappa \Delta t} \\
\mathbb{V}\mathrm{ar}(\zeta) &= \sigma^2 \frac{1-e^{-2\kappa \Delta t}}{2\kappa}
\end{aligned}
$$
Substituting the second equation into the first and solving for $m$ gives $m = a / (1-b)$. Use the same substitution in the third equation and rearrange to get
$$
\sigma^2 = \frac{\mathbb{V}\mathrm{ar}(\zeta) \cdot 2 \kappa}{1 - b^2} \>,
$$
but, recall that the variance of the equilibrium distribution (by looking far into the future) for $X(t)$ is just $\sigma^2 / 2 \kappa$ and so this gives your result.
Addendum: If you're wondering how the expression
$$
\mathbb{V}\mathrm{ar}(\zeta) = \sigma^2 \frac{1-e^{-2\kappa \Delta t}}{2\kappa}
$$
was obtained, it is via the (remarkable and beautiful!) Ito isometry and the fact that an Ito integral is a zero-mean martingale; namely, in this instance,
$$
\mathbb{E}\Big(\sigma \int_{t_0}^{\,t_0 + \Delta t} e^{-\kappa(t_0+\Delta t - s)} \, \rd W(s)\Big)^2 = \sigma^2 \int_{t_0}^{\,t_0 + \Delta t} e^{-2 \kappa(t_0 +\Delta t - s)} \, \rd s
$$
where we note that the integrand has been squared on the right-hand side and we "get to replace" $\rd W(s)$ with $\rd s$, converting the problem into one of solving a standard Riemann integral.