Linked Questions
22 questions linked to/from Why is a normalizing factor required in Bayes’ Theorem?
5
votes
1
answer
5k
views
Why ignore the denominator of bayes rule? [duplicate]
I am a new beginner in stats. I have specifically diverted my attention towards this because, I wish to understand the concept of Deep Bayesian Learning, so I am starting with the basics. The question ...
2
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Why is the normalization necesary in Bayesian inference? [duplicate]
In this post it reads that:
normalization can be intractable when applying Bayes’ Theorem
And in this answer it says that:
it does not depend on the parameters since these have been ...
0
votes
2
answers
666
views
Is the density of the unnormalised posterior distribution the same as the density for normalised posterior? [duplicate]
The posterior distribution is proportional to the likelihood times the prior distribution $p(\theta|D) \propto p(D|\theta)p(\theta)$. Computing $p(D|\theta)p(\theta)$ would give the un-normalised ...
0
votes
1
answer
294
views
How is the "proportional" calculated in Bayes theorem? [duplicate]
I am struggling with the Wikipedia entry on Likelihood.
In an example it mentions $L(P_H = 0.5 |HH) = 0.25$
It mentions that
Bayes' theorem implies that the posterior probability is proportional
to ...
182
votes
6
answers
122k
views
Can a probability distribution value exceeding 1 be OK?
On the Wikipedia page about naive Bayes classifiers, there is this line:
$p(\mathrm{height}|\mathrm{male}) = 1.5789$ (A probability distribution over 1 is OK. It is the area under the bell curve ...
8
votes
2
answers
3k
views
What does it mean intuitively to know a pdf "up to a constant"?
I've seen this mentioned numerous times, most recently in motivating the MCMC method and description of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The text (Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, Second ...
6
votes
3
answers
1k
views
What is the "grid" in Bayesian grid approximations?
I tried looking for my specific question, but I only found partially related questions here, here, and here. I think my question is much simpler than what was asked and answered in these queries. I'm ...
8
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Intuition of Bayesian normalizing constant
In the commonly mentioned mammography screening problem with a screening likelihood of 80%, a prior of 10% and a false positive rate of 50%, or its variants, it is easy to explain that the conditional ...
2
votes
1
answer
10k
views
With the Naive Bayes classifier, why do we have to normalize the probabilities after calculating the probabilities of each hypothesis?
In the Naive Bayes classifier, why do we have to normalize the probabilities after calculating the probabilities of each hypothesis?
4
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Why *only* denominator(marginal likelihood) is difficult in Bayesian Inference, cant we keep track of it while calculating numerator
First, this question might give impression that it is related to several question but other don't explain the confusion regarding nominator part.
For 2D, Given we have two parameters $\theta$ and $\...
2
votes
1
answer
4k
views
Bayesian posterior: is multiplying likelihood by prior (rather than simulation) an acceptable approach?
Ken Rice has a helpful introductory set of slides available online called 'Bayesian Statistics (a very brief introduction)'.
http://faculty.washington.edu/kenrice/BayesIntroClassEpi515kmr2016.pdf
On ...
6
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Confusion in Gibbs sampling
I am self-studying Gibbs sampling from a book. The book introduces metropolis hastings algortihm to generate representative values from a posterior distribution. So we know $p(D | \theta) p(\theta)$ ...
1
vote
1
answer
1k
views
posterior is proportional to joint?
The posterior
$$
P(M|D) = \frac{P(D|M) P(M)}{P(D)}
$$
I think in my first class it said that $P(D)$ is a fixed thing, so it is permissible to ignore it for optimization purpose and use
$$
P(M|D)...
2
votes
2
answers
329
views
Likelihood and Prior density scales
I have a question about priors and likelihoods and their visualisation.
A Bernoulli likelihood is $$\theta^{N_1}(1 - \theta)^{N_0}$$
where $N_1$ and $N_0$ are number of success and failures, ...
4
votes
1
answer
494
views
Derivation of Logistic regression
I am trying to understand the derivation of logistic regression. Some books like the famous Elements of Statistical Learning just give you the formula without too ...