Skip to main content
1 of 13
Olivier
  • 819
  • 7
  • 23

What about $n \geq 30$?

Let $\{X_i\}_{i=1}^n$ be a family of i.i.d. random variables taking values in $[0,1]$, having a mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. A simple confidence interval for the mean, using $\sigma$ whenever it is known, is given by $$ P( | \bar X - \mu| > \varepsilon) \le \frac{\sigma^2}{n\varepsilon^2} \le\frac{1}{n \varepsilon^2} \qquad (1). $$

Also, because $\frac{\bar X- \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}}$ is asymptotically distributed as a standard normal random variable, the normal distribution is sometimes used to "construct" an approximate confidence interval.


In fact, in multiple-choice statistics exams, I've had to use this approximation whenever $n \geq 30$. I've always felt very uncomfortable with this (more than you can imagine), as the approximation error is not quantified.


  • Why is the normal approximation used blindly whenever $n \geq 30$? Can its use be justified? Can the error of approximation be quantified?
  • I don't want, ever again, to blindly apply the rule $n \geq 30$. Are there good references that can support me in a refusal to do so and provide appropriate alternatives?
Olivier
  • 819
  • 7
  • 23