What would a bayesian do if she wanted to do inference for the mean with a large sample but has no idea of the underlying distributions?

A frequentist statitician would use the sample mean as a point estimate and CLT for the distribution of the estimator. All she has to assume is finite variance.

I have found [Bernstein Von-Mises Theorem][1] which states that given a random sample $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ and

 - a prior $p(\mu)$ for the mean
 - a distribution for the sample given the parameter $f_{x | \mu}$
 
Then if the sample size is sufficiently large the posterior distribution of the mean given the sample is approximately normal, i.e

$$ \mu_{|_{X_1, \ldots X_n}} \approx \mathcal{N}\left( \hat{\mu}_{ml}\, ; \, \frac{1}{I(\mu_0) n}\right)$$ 

Where the mean is the maximum likelihood estimator and $I(\mu_0)$ is Fisher information number for the true mean.

In the case where we have no knowledge of $f_{x | \mu}$ there is the problem that  maximum likelihood nor fisher information number can be calculated.  But what can be done? Becuase even if we do not know it the distribution exists and it will be approximately normal.


 
 
  [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein%E2%80%93von_Mises_theorem