Search Results

I'm running a linear fit model using the lme4 package in R and the following code keeps coming up with the error boundary (singular) fit: see ?isSingular Can someone please help? …

I'm trying to fit a generalised mixed model for some embryo data and I am getting the error for singular fit. … Is this the reason for the singular fit? If so is it OK to ignore this message or do I need to adjust my experiment somehow? …

Here is the model: logRT ~ condition * NumSpk * Group + (condition * NumSpk | Participant) I tried to run now the exact same model - and I get a singular fit message. … To my understanding, a singular fit would also reflect in correlations near +1 or -1. This is not the case, not then and not now. …

fit, because the correlation between intercept and x random effects is -1. … Can someone explain to me the benefits and problems using either method to deal with singular fits? …

) fit: see ? … ) fit mean in layman terms? …

I'm trying to run a simple MLM, but I'm bumping into singular fit warnings: y <- Reduce(c,replicate(10, scale(rnorm(700, 0, 1)))) x <- rep(c("A","B"), each=700, times=10) g <- rep(c("g1", " … g2", "g3", "g4", "g5", "g6", "g7", "g8", "g9", "g10"), each=7000) df <- data.frame(y=y, x=x, g=g) m <- lmer(y ~ x + (1|g), data=df) boundary (singular) fit: see ? …

When I refit the model in lmer I got a singular fit error. Why is this happening? Does it mean that the model fit in NLME is also singular but not throwing a warning? … ) fit: see help('isSingular') …

What are common causes of a 'singular fit' in generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs), especially when including random intercepts for grouping variables? … When using the glmer function in R, sometimes you get the warning: boundary (singular) fit: see help('isSingular') What strategies or techniques can be employed to address or prevent this issue? …

Although the output of anova showed the second model had more explanatory power, I'm not sure I should accept it due to the fact that it had a boundary (singular) fit. … ) fit: see help('isSingular') Linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood ['lmerMod'] Formula: satisfaction ~ status + sex + age + readmission + (1 + readmission | area/id) Data: hospSatisfaction …

But it is showing an error of singular fit. How do I correct it? … ) fit: see ? …

I am trying to run mixed models (logistic regression) on a dataframe with the glmer function from lme4 but I always receive this message: "boundary (singular) fit: see ? …

However, when I try to run the same baseline model with the standardized sleep duration, I get a singular fit error: mod_RQ1_base <- lmer(standardized_adjusted_sleep_duration ~ (1|snapshot_id), REML = … Since I want to model what predicts variation sleep duration that are relative to each person's individual baseline, how can I do this realistically and also avoid the singular fit error using mixed models …

) fit: see ? … isSingular With this code I get a singular fit. Now, I realize that the singular fit issue may stem from the complexity of the random effects structure. …

I understand a singular fit to be cases where a random effect has a variance of 0. … Why is this called a "singular" fit? Does it refer to there only being a "single" value for each subject's intercept, for example? …

I get the warning message 'singular fit', which is specified as 'convergence code 0; 1 optimizer warnings; 0 lme4 warnings' in summary(model). … set.seed(2) df_1 <- get_subject_df(means=subject_means, sds=subject_sds, samples_per_ind=5) lme4::lmer(vals ~ 1 + (1|ID), data = df_1) singular fit Linear mixed model fit by REML ['lmerMod'] Formula …