Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with cross-validation
Search options not deleted
user 11674
Repeatedly withholding subsets of the data during model fitting in order to quantify the model performance on the withheld data subsets.
2
votes
Is cross-validation an effective approach for feature/model selection for microarray data?
The answer really seems to be that cross-validation is not great because its results are extremely variable but it remains the best option available. The only other competitive approach seems to be t …
- 81
6
votes
2
answers
798
views
Is cross-validation an effective approach for feature/model selection for microarray data?
I've been working with WEKA to build class predictors using this (rather old..) breast cancer dataset. The dataset is divided into a training and a test set. I've been testing different learning sch …
- 81