Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with r
Search options not deleted
user 30413
Use this tag for any *on-topic* question that (a) involves `R` either as a critical part of the question or expected answer, & (b) is not *just* about how to use `R`.
0
votes
Determining an optimum and distribution range from species abundance vs environmental gradie...
I assume by distribution you mean the range of mud where at least 1 individual of a species occurs. If so than for the distribution range use
range(df$mud[df$abundance>0])
I don't know if you have …
- 243
14
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Why do lm and biglm in R give different p-values for the same data?
3.491 0.0732 .
x -1.3800 0.3191 -4.325 0.0495 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 0.7134 on 2 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared … : 0.9034, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8551
F-statistic: 18.71 on 1 and 2 DF, p-value: 0.04952
Now, try the same thing with biglm from the biglm package:
XX<-biglm(y~x, data=MyDf)
print(summary(XX) …
- 243