Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 76484

A measure of the degree of association among a pair of variables.

1 vote
Accepted

Pearson Correlation and Linear Combination

$\newcommand{\Cov}{\operatorname{Cov}}$ Let $u_1=ax+cw$ and $u_2=by+dz$. Then we have \begin{align*} \rho(u_1,u_2) &=\frac{\Cov(u_1,u_2)}{\sqrt{V(u_1)}\sqrt{V(u_2)}}. \end{align*} Let $C=\dfrac{1}{\sq …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
0 votes

Correlating noisy time series with a phase difference (lag)

Here's some Python code I wrote once to test out the max correlation method. … 0][1])) print("Now we find max correlation coefficient:") # Create a vector of correlation coefficients. …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Does significant correlation imply at least some common underlying cause?

The usual "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy is the fallacy that says correlation always implies causation, or even that you can infer causality. This is still a fallacy. … However, if you add another condition to the correlation - namely, that of mechanism - then you get Reichenbach’s common cause principle: "No correlation without causation." …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
2 votes

If 2 variables are dependent, then there always exists a 3rd variable that causally influenc...

This is the reason the aphorism, "Correlation does not imply causation" ought to be replaced with Reichenbach's principle: "No correlation without causation." … Or at least, "Correlation usually implies causation." Causation is more fundamental than correlation, and it's certainly much easier for humans to reason about than correlation. …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
3 votes

Is there any truth to the phrase "statistics mean nothing to the individual"?

I agree with the other answers, but I would like to add that in the New Causal Revolution, particularly with the highest level of reasoning - the counterfactual - it is possible to reason about indivi …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Difference between Covariance and Mutual Information

You can interpret the correlation as a measure of how well a straight line (linear relationship) fits the data. If you have a correlation of $\pm 1,$ then it is a perfect linear relationship. … You can introduce a new feature, call it square-of-velocity, and then do a correlation with that new feature. …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
573 views

Correlation Coefficient Squared is Less Than or Equal to One

Let $\rho$ denote the correlation coefficient of $Y_1$ and $Y_2.$ Using the inequality $$[E(Y_1Y_2)]^2\le E\!\left(Y_1^2\right) E\! …
Adrian Keister's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
780 views

Correlation Coefficient for Hypergeometric-type Distribution

Find the correlation coefficient for $Y_1$ and $Y_2.$ (Let $p_i=N_i/N$ for $i=1,2,3.$) This is Exercise 5.110 in Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 5th Ed., by Wackerly, Mendenhall, and Scheaffer …
Adrian Keister's user avatar