Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with small-sample
Search options not deleted
user 94194
Refers to statistical complications or problems due to having few data. If your question is about a small sample relative to the number of variables, please use the [underdetermined] tag instead.
2
votes
1
answer
437
views
Can we say there is High Bias if we have high training error due to small training data size?
If for a very small dataset we have a high training error, can we say that we are underfitting or have a high bias because of the low amount of training data?
Or do we use these terms (underfitting a …
- 143