Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 174 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange
18,682
reputation
2
61
83

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

359
answers
10
questions
~3.4m
people reached

Top Tags (278)

Score 302
Posts 54
Posts % 15
Score 289
Posts 66
Score 125
Posts 21
Score 116
Posts 21
Score 112
Posts 32
Score 95
Posts 32

Top Posts (369) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

View all questions and answers

Badges (146)

Gold

2

Rarest

Silver

61

Rarest

Bronze

83

Rarest