20,038
reputation
3
66
89

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

376
answers
10
questions
~4.2m
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 8 years, 11 months
  • 6,056 profile views
  • Last seen yesterday

Top tags (293)

Score 320
Posts 57
Posts % 15
Score 316
Posts 69
Score 132
Posts 21
Score 122
Posts 21
Score 119
Posts 34
Score 102
Posts 33

Top posts (386) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

View all questions and answers

Badges (158)

Gold

3

Rarest

Silver

66

Rarest

Bronze

89

Rarest