21,839
reputation
4
71
91

probabilityislogic
top 0.56% overall

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

392
answers
10
questions
~4.8m
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 10 years, 1 month
  • 6,719 profile views
  • Last seen Dec 18 '20 at 13:43

Top tags (294)

Score 360
Posts 63
Posts % 16
Score 344
Posts 71
Score 143
Posts 22
Score 131
Posts 36
Score 130
Posts 21
Score 111
Posts 36

Top posts (402)

View all questions and answers

Badges (166)

Gold

4

Rarest

Silver

71

Rarest

Bronze

91

Rarest