19,545
reputation
3
64
87

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

368
answers
10
questions
~4.1m
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 8 years, 8 months
  • 5,912 profile views
  • Last seen 19 mins ago

Top tags (288)

Score 314
Posts 55
Posts % 15
Score 304
Posts 67
Score 128
Posts 21
Score 121
Posts 21
Score 117
Posts 33
Score 101
Posts 32

Top posts (378) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

View all questions and answers

Badges (154)

Gold

3

Rarest

Silver

64

Rarest

Bronze

87

Rarest