21,299
reputation
4
68
90

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

386
answers
10
questions
~4.6m
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 9 years, 5 months
  • 6,381 profile views
  • Last seen 9 hours ago

Top tags (296)

Score 350
Posts 62
Posts % 16
Score 326
Posts 70
Score 139
Posts 22
Score 128
Posts 35
Score 128
Posts 21
Score 107
Posts 35

Top posts (396)

View all questions and answers

Badges (162)

Gold

4

Rarest

Silver

68

Rarest

Bronze

90

Rarest