probabilityislogic
  • Member for 10 years, 11 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
  • Australia
Stats
22,357
reputation
5.4m
reached
392
answers
10
questions
Loading…
About

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

4
gold badges
74
silver badges
95
bronze badges
367
Score
63
Posts
16
Posts %
359
Score
71
Posts
18
Posts %
148
Score
22
Posts
5
Posts %
137
Score
21
Posts
5
Posts %
135
Score
36
Posts
9
Posts %
115
Score
36
Posts
9
Posts %