Timeline for Comparing importance of different sets of predictors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 2, 2020 at 16:58 | history | edited | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Used LaTeX for notation.
|
Jul 13, 2012 at 22:47 | comment | added | Frank Harrell | I wish I had a reference for that. People often examine things without penalization then do penalization at the last minute. But I think you can also compare penalized log likelihoods. | |
Jul 13, 2012 at 19:33 | comment | added | julieth | @FrankHarrell Do these results apply to the penalized likelihood as well? Does the penalized likelihood have any properties that make it differ from the likelihood with respect to this variable-importance measure? Could you suggest any papers that describe this in greater detail? Thanks. | |
May 14, 2011 at 16:02 | comment | added | Frank Harrell | For sure. The causal chain has to be understood before modeling even commences. | |
Apr 30, 2011 at 1:05 | comment | added | rolando2 | would you also grant that there's a risk, in devising a purely statistical solution, of missing a possible overarching problem whereby all 3 groups of predictors could be measuring characteristics/behaviours occurring at the same time. Without an earlier-causes-later sort of basis for a causal chain, might it be impossible to definitively disentangle causal relationships in this situation--whatever our calculations might be? (I'm trying to think the way James Davis does in The Logic of Causal Order.) | |
Apr 28, 2011 at 1:54 | comment | added | Frank Harrell | I didn't use the best notation. I mean the likelihood ratio $\chi^2$ statistic, which is the change in -2 log likelihood upon removing the set of variables being tested. | |
Apr 27, 2011 at 12:57 | comment | added | B_Miner | To confirm, your approach is to compute L1 as the reduction in deviance (-2*) resulting from the inclusion of the four social variables, adjusted by the df of these four variables? And likewise in turn for L2 and L3? | |
Apr 27, 2011 at 11:43 | history | answered | Frank Harrell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |