Timeline for Model assumptions of partial least squares (PLS) regression
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 12, 2020 at 14:38 | answer | added | King_Aardvark | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 19, 2015 at 17:22 | answer | added | amoeba | timeline score: 6 | |
Nov 19, 2015 at 16:41 | history | edited | amoeba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
various edits
|
Aug 12, 2015 at 6:36 | answer | added | ejspina | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:52 | comment | added | emudrak | A client had a reviewer comment to a paper that said something line "show you checked the linearity assumption." How would you do this? | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:45 | comment | added | emudrak | The link to Wold. et al is incorrect. Is this the one it should be? libpls.net/publication/PLS_basic_2001.pdf | |
Jun 4, 2014 at 15:47 | history | edited | Patrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Jun 4, 2014 at 0:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/473989016589565952 | ||
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:53 | history | edited | Patrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:22 | history | edited | Patrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Jun 3, 2014 at 19:13 | history | asked | Patrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |