Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10, 2014 at 1:48 comment added user44764 It seems strange to me to be in a position where I would be evaluating the fit of my model without comparing it to other possible fits, but after a careful reread of the question I think you're right about what is being asked for.
Jun 10, 2014 at 1:37 comment added dimitriy @Matthew I would not advocate using CMs (or any univariate measures of fit) for automated model selection. I don't think the OP was asking about model selection. But as a measure of fit that tells you if a given model puts people in the right buckets, or perhaps on a hold-out sample, CMs can be useful.
Jun 10, 2014 at 1:24 comment added user44764 Using confusion matrices is akin to using % predicted, which is an improper scoring rule and could potentially lead to favoring a 'bad' model.. A proper scoring rule as well as McFadden's $R^2$ and other likelihood measures will reward models which better capture the true probabilities.
Jun 10, 2014 at 1:05 history answered dimitriy CC BY-SA 3.0