Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 19, 2014 at 11:26 history edited amoeba CC BY-SA 3.0
light editing
May 12, 2011 at 22:23 answer added ncray timeline score: 1
May 7, 2011 at 16:01 answer added bill_080 timeline score: 0
May 7, 2011 at 9:56 comment added Richard @cardinal, sorry for being ignorance. I missed the part of the thread yesterday and did not answer your question. Regard "can't get abitrary negativ correlations", I hope my clarification of previous question answers your question.
May 7, 2011 at 8:14 history edited chl CC BY-SA 3.0
spelling + title
May 7, 2011 at 3:25 comment added JMS @whuber Good, thanks. Might we close this then? It seems "duplicate in intention" as it were and doesn't contain much beyond my foolishness.
May 7, 2011 at 2:19 comment added whuber @JMS We're starting to get some clarification in new comments to the preceding question linked to by @Cardinal: you might want to check there.
May 7, 2011 at 1:52 comment added JMS Is the 90/10 requirement "hard"? In lower dimensions you might be able to get close by drawing from a Wishart centered at $I$, computing the correlation matrix, and rejecting samples that aren't within some tolerance. Though I suspect this won't scale well at all...
May 7, 2011 at 1:29 comment added cardinal Can you define what you mean by "random"? This seems related to your previous question.
May 7, 2011 at 1:23 comment added cardinal You have to be aware that you can't get arbitrary negative correlations between variables, for one thing.
May 7, 2011 at 0:41 answer added JMS timeline score: 0
May 7, 2011 at 0:30 history asked Richard CC BY-SA 3.0