Skip to main content

Timeline for Why cov(AX)=A cov(X) A'

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 6, 2018 at 7:24 comment added Brofessor How are we able to pull out the $A$ and $A^T$? for the last step.
Jul 8, 2014 at 16:38 vote accept remo
Jul 8, 2014 at 15:49 comment added PseudoRandom I have substantially edited my answer. Tell me if it answers your question or if there is something more you would like to see.
Jul 8, 2014 at 15:47 history edited PseudoRandom CC BY-SA 3.0
added 227 characters in body
Jul 8, 2014 at 15:10 history edited PseudoRandom CC BY-SA 3.0
added 155 characters in body
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:56 history edited PseudoRandom CC BY-SA 3.0
added 320 characters in body
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:45 comment added PseudoRandom Ok, I got what you are saying. If $X$ is a matrix of random variables, you must beforehand use the "vec" operator and convert it into a column vector and adjust the model accordingly. After that, you can apply the theorem. The actual theorem is about the covariance of $Ax$ (a matrix and a column vector). If you want a formulation for $AX$, it could probably be derived, but using the "vec" operator is simpler.
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:42 comment added remo I cannot find such a comment, By the way I added cov(X) to my question and I mean X is a matrix of variables not necessarily symmetric. If there is such a formulation for cov(AX)? (Please see X as a matrix and not a random variable)
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:39 history edited PseudoRandom CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 145 characters in body
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:35 comment added PseudoRandom In your code, you were using "X" as a covariance matrix (look at the first comment). What I meant was: the covariance matrix must be symmetric.
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:33 comment added remo Why X must be symmetric. I know cov(X) must be symmetric, but what about X, itself?
Jul 8, 2014 at 14:23 history answered PseudoRandom CC BY-SA 3.0