Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2014 at 23:57 comment added kyle Actually, based on their definition of $b_j$, the numerator in the exponential does reduce to $\mu_j^2$ in the symmetric (independent dimensions with common variance) case.
Feb 28, 2014 at 20:48 comment added kyle @NRH I've worked through the MGF myself in the symmetric case ($\lambda_j = \sigma^2$) where $p=2$ and instead of $b_j^2 \lambda_j$ in the summation, I have $\mu_j^2$. Simulation verifies the first moment. It's possible that this is the "linear function" you mention and that this is peculiar to the symmetric case, but I thought I'd point it out in case there's an error.
Jun 21, 2011 at 23:58 comment added Nick Thanks for the reference, I found the book and am slowly trying to make my way through it
Jun 21, 2011 at 23:56 vote accept Nick
May 12, 2011 at 23:43 history edited NRH CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 7 characters in body
May 12, 2011 at 18:48 history answered NRH CC BY-SA 3.0