Timeline for Paired permutation test for repeated measures
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2020 at 16:14 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| May 21, 2011 at 23:19 | vote | accept | Rafe | ||
| May 21, 2011 at 23:19 | vote | accept | Rafe | ||
| May 21, 2011 at 23:19 | |||||
| May 21, 2011 at 23:19 | vote | accept | Rafe | ||
| May 21, 2011 at 23:19 | |||||
| May 19, 2011 at 13:00 | answer | added | Henrik | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 19, 2011 at 7:41 | answer | added | Nick Sabbe | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2011 at 22:41 | answer | added | Mike Lawrence | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 18, 2011 at 21:44 | comment | added | Rafe | No, each female-male pair was observed in both conditions. | |
| May 18, 2011 at 21:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/70959925718822912 | ||
| May 18, 2011 at 21:03 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Are you saying that, say, F1-M2 was observed in condition "A" but not in condition "B" and that perhaps F1-M3 was observed in condition "B"? That is, each female should have been observed in both conditions but perhaps was paired with different sets of males in those two conditions? | |
| May 18, 2011 at 20:27 | history | edited | user88 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 18, 2011 at 20:18 | history | asked | Rafe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |