Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
S Nov 6, 2014 at 19:22 history bounty ended Henrik
S Nov 6, 2014 at 19:22 history notice removed Henrik
Nov 5, 2014 at 8:28 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/529913124627820544
S Nov 5, 2014 at 8:25 history bounty started Henrik
S Nov 5, 2014 at 8:25 history notice added Henrik Reward existing answer
Nov 4, 2014 at 18:41 vote accept Henrik
Nov 4, 2014 at 18:23 answer added Jake Westfall timeline score: 21
Nov 4, 2014 at 1:13 comment added Jake Westfall For the three-way problem, the first lmer model that you wrote (which excludes the random two-way interactions) is not expected to be equivalent to a 3-way RM-ANOVA, but the second one that you wrote (which includes the random two-way interactions) should be. As for why there is a discrepancy even with that model, I have a hunch about what the problem is, going to grab dinner then will look at the toy dataset some more.
Oct 2, 2014 at 20:07 comment added Henrik @RasmusBååth Go Ahead and try to fit it, lmer will complain as the random effects are not identified any more. Initially I also thought that this is the model I want, but it is not. If you compare the lmer model I propose for the 2-way case with the standard ANOVA you will see that the F-values exactly match. As said in the response I linked.
Oct 2, 2014 at 20:04 comment added Rasmus Bååth Are you sure that you don't want your two level model to be y ~ a*b + (1 + a*b|subject), d[d$c == "1",] ? Or perhaps I'm missing something?
Oct 2, 2014 at 19:58 answer added Masato Nakazawa timeline score: 1
Oct 2, 2014 at 19:48 history edited gung - Reinstate Monica
added tag
Oct 2, 2014 at 19:37 history asked Henrik CC BY-SA 3.0