Timeline for The meaning of translation completeness w.r.t a random variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2015 at 19:17 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 29, 2015 at 23:48 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2014 at 7:35 | vote | accept | Druss2k | ||
| Oct 6, 2014 at 22:00 | history | edited | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 6, 2014 at 21:10 | history | edited | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
And added the entire setup of the proof
|
| Oct 6, 2014 at 20:48 | history | edited | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Included the integral.
|
| Oct 6, 2014 at 20:43 | comment | added | Ryan Webb | Also, K is a positive constant. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 20:41 | history | edited | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Included the integral.
|
| Oct 6, 2014 at 20:36 | comment | added | Ryan Webb | @whuber Added the integral. I came across this because i was interested in what conditions are placed on G as well. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 20:35 | history | edited | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Included the integral.
|
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:35 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Exactly what is the "bracketed statement in the integral"? Clearly this result is not general and must follow from strong assumptions about $G$ and $K$ that have not been stated in the question or here. Because that makes this entire thread incomprehensible to people without access to the reference, we would appreciate if you (or the OP) could fill in these gaps. | |
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:49 | |||||
| Oct 6, 2014 at 19:21 | history | answered | Ryan Webb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |