Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 18, 2016 at 20:30 vote accept masfenix
Oct 24, 2014 at 18:55 comment added scottzed (accidentally pressed enter above)... Also, the values aren't measurements, they're probabilities, so correlation doesn't make a lot of sense. You should submit a question asking what row-wise distance metric makes sense to use with a matrix of probabilities, I'm sure someone will have a better rationale than I can provide.
Oct 24, 2014 at 18:47 comment added scottzed It was more intuition that made me say that, I didn't have a formal reason in mind. Many zeroes will make a correlation much higher between the rows of your matrix than is probably indicated
Oct 24, 2014 at 14:41 comment added masfenix Thank you. I have a much better understanding now. Do you mind expanding on (given the number of zeroes in your dataset, correlation is probably not a good choice).? I don't have a statistics background so I am not sure why this is the case. Also, if I was to use correlation (just to see why its a bad idea), what would be a good formula to use?
Oct 24, 2014 at 2:55 review First posts
Oct 24, 2014 at 3:00
Oct 24, 2014 at 2:53 history edited scottzed CC BY-SA 3.0
expanded on what MDS is doing
Oct 24, 2014 at 2:44 history answered scottzed CC BY-SA 3.0