Timeline for Inconsistency between R and SAS for MLE on Weibull
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| S Apr 20, 2019 at 19:36 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken images fixed (click 'rendered output' or 'side-by-side' to see the difference); for more info, see https://gist.github.com/Glorfindel83/9d954d34385d2ac2597bbe864466259f
|
| Apr 20, 2019 at 19:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2019 at 19:36 | |||||
| Nov 16, 2014 at 16:57 | history | edited | wolfies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Nov 16, 2014 at 16:52 | comment | added | wolfies | @COOLSerdash Oops - just a typo. The density entered is the Weibull and all is fine ... I have fixed the name typo. Thanks for picking that up. | |
| Nov 16, 2014 at 16:50 | history | edited | wolfies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected typo: Gamma -> Weibull
|
| Nov 16, 2014 at 16:41 | comment | added | COOLSerdash | wolfies, where does the gamma distribution enter the picture? Am I missing something? | |
| Nov 16, 2014 at 15:54 | history | answered | wolfies | CC BY-SA 3.0 |