Skip to main content

Timeline for Determining Sample Size for ANOVA

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 7, 2017 at 15:26 history edited gung - Reinstate Monica
changed tag
Feb 27, 2015 at 1:06 comment added Glen_b In general, rather than use ANOVA for counts, I'd suggest a GLM suitable GLMs (Poisson or negative binomial, perhaps) can do the equivalent analysis to ANOVA. If you do use ANOVA, I'd strongly suggest considering the Welch correction.
Feb 26, 2015 at 20:09 history edited paulsef11 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 608 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Feb 26, 2015 at 19:10 comment added paulsef11 @Glen_b Three months later and I'm finally getting back to this question. You're absolutely right about counts v proportions. I'll go ahead and edit the question.
Dec 19, 2014 at 4:46 comment added Glen_b It looks you're dealing with counts (0,1,2,...), not proportions. Your title is misleading/confusing. If you're prepared to assume a Poisson or Negative Binomial model it may be possible to do some kind of similar calculation.
Dec 18, 2014 at 6:27 comment added paulsef11 If by "harm" you mean decrease the mean, then yes, it's possible. Can you share with me the process that you're using?
Dec 18, 2014 at 6:22 comment added dimitriy You will need the sd eventually to sure, but I can repeat the calculation for range. Can the treatment "harm"?
Dec 18, 2014 at 6:11 comment added paulsef11 I'm not expecting to see a change in the standard deviation between the experiment and control. Unfortunately I can't get to an actual number for the SD right now since the data is hard to get to. Is it completely necessary to have?
Dec 18, 2014 at 2:36 comment added dimitriy Do you know the standard deviation? Do you expect the treatment to alter it?
Dec 18, 2014 at 1:54 answer added dimitriy timeline score: 1
Dec 18, 2014 at 1:27 review First posts
Dec 18, 2014 at 2:02
Dec 18, 2014 at 1:22 history asked paulsef11 CC BY-SA 3.0