Timeline for How to test whether people remembered more items given an intervention administered within subjects?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2015 at 17:29 | comment | added | ianf | Yes they recall the list immediately after memorisation and 8hrs later. The list set is counterbalanced across intervention. No the lists have different information points. - essentially each list is distinst containing the same characteristic but dif diagnosis- history of illness(always descrive same way site, duration , past history, allergies etcalways following same format. Number of items from 50-70 points,total of points is almost the same (over the 5 lists recalled). I tried to keep them similar set 1=81,56,77,49,75, set 2=78,55,74,51,78 that was the reason i counterbalanced them. | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:52 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | So each person is recalling each list of items 2x. Do both sets have 5 lists? Is the set that goes w/ intervention j counterbalanced across interventions? Are the interventions counterbalanced by order? Are there the same number of items on every list? How many? Are the items w/i a list thematically related (eg to pain, as in your response above), but distinct from other lists? | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:27 | history | edited | ianf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 317 characters in body
|
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:17 | history | edited | ianf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 317 characters in body
|
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:12 | history | edited | ianf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 317 characters in body
|
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:08 | comment | added | ianf | no intervention time case correct percentage correct 1 2 1 6 21 26.92307692 1 2 1 7 14 25.45454545 1 2 1 8 16 21.62162162 1 2 1 9 18 35.29411765 1 2 1 10 15 19.23076923 1 1 1 1 13 16.04938272 1 1 1 2 6 10.71428571 1 1 1 3 4 5.194805195 1 1 1 4 7 14.28571429 1 1 1 5 6 8 3 2 1 6 37 47.43589744 3 2 1 7 28 50.90909091 3 2 1 8 31 41.89189189 3 2 1 9 24 47.05882353 3 2 1 10 32 41.02564 i then looked at a verbal recall of the information the same way shap wilk was>0.05 so should i do anova for this other data? Or have i done it wrong ? | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:05 | comment | added | ianf | I've posted an example of the data on next post. Its a crossover so the cases he recalled were 1-5 and 6-10 on different days intervention or no intervention. The amount of info in each case was different but total number of items the same over 5 cases. For the written version Shap wilk <0.05 for correct & percent corr for intervention group so I did Kwallis (can i do that as its grouping all the results of cases together?). my stata command was 'kwallis percentage correct, by(intervention)' | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 16:05 | comment | added | ianf | sorry went wrong above | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 15:49 | comment | added | ianf | Num interventn time case correct percentage correct 1 2 1 6 21 26.92307692 1 2 1 7 14 25.45454545 1 2 1 8 16 21.62162162 1 2 1 9 18 35.29411765 1 2 1 10 15 19.23076923 1 1 1 1 13 16.04938272 1 1 1 2 6 10.71428571 1 1 1 3 4 5.194805195 1 1 1 4 7 14.28571429 1 1 1 5 6 8 | |
| Jan 11, 2015 at 13:51 | comment | added | ianf | its the number of items recalled. the lists are items of information, for example it i describe pain, i describe its site, position severity, etc, therefore site, position and severity would each receive a mark. | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 20:47 | answer | added | Bosley | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:59 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | What is the response exactly? Is it number of items recalled out of some total number of items? Can you clarify the nature of the lists? | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:58 | history | edited | gung - Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified situation in title; edited tags; edited for English; removed thanks
|
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:53 | history | edited | gung - Reinstate Monica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited for English; removed thanks
|
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:53 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2015 at 19:36 | history | asked | ianf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |