Skip to main content
added 454 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$enter image description here

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

On that subject, see the four examples near the end of this answer, which all have the same five-number summaries, but which have very different looking histograms (which I'll reproduce below):

four different histograms - (a) roughly normal, (b) bimodal, (c) peaked with flat tails, (d) skewed - but with identical boxplots and so identical 5 number summaries

This again emphasizes that five number summaries don't generally do very much to tell us about shape.

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$enter image description here

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$enter image description here

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

On that subject, see the four examples near the end of this answer, which all have the same five-number summaries, but which have very different looking histograms (which I'll reproduce below):

four different histograms - (a) roughly normal, (b) bimodal, (c) peaked with flat tails, (d) skewed - but with identical boxplots and so identical 5 number summaries

This again emphasizes that five number summaries don't generally do very much to tell us about shape.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

![enter image description here][1]enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$![enter image description here][2]enter image description here

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction. [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/khIqh.png [2]:

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities https://i.sstatic.net/qw66I.png- two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

![enter image description here][1]

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$![enter image description here][2]

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction. [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/khIqh.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/qw66I.png

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$enter image description here

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

added 296 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here![enter image description here][1]

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$![enter image description here][2]

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction. [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/khIqh.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/qw66I.png

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

enter image description here

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

This is most clearly answered by considering the (cumulative) distribution function.

Specifying the minimum, maximum and the three quartiles specifies exactly 5 points on the cdf, but the cdf between those points may be any monotonic nondecreasing function in between that still passes through those points:

![enter image description here][1]

In the drawing, both the red and black CDFs share the same minimum, maximum, and quartiles, but are clearly different distributions. Clearly any number of other CDFs could be specified that also pass through the same five points.

The same notion can be applied to sample quantities - two different empirical CDFs may nevertheless have the same five-number summary.

In fact, all we've done is restrict our distribution function to lie within four boxes:

$\qquad$![enter image description here][2]

(as long as it also continues to satisfy the other conditions for a CDF). That isn't all that much of a restriction. [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/khIqh.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/qw66I.png

Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k
Loading