Skip to main content

If you permute the neurons in the hidden layer and do the same permutation on the weights of the adjacent layers then the loss doesn't change. Hence if there is a non-zero global minimaminimum as a function of weights, then it can't be unique since the permutation of weights gives another minimaminimum. Hence the function is not convex.

If you permute the neurons in the hidden layer and do the same permutation on the weights of the adjacent layers then the loss doesn't change. Hence if there is a non-zero global minima as a function of weights, then it can't be unique since the permutation of weights gives another minima. Hence the function is not convex.

If you permute the neurons in the hidden layer and do the same permutation on the weights of the adjacent layers then the loss doesn't change. Hence if there is a non-zero global minimum as a function of weights, then it can't be unique since the permutation of weights gives another minimum. Hence the function is not convex.

Source Link
Abhinav
  • 381
  • 3
  • 4

If you permute the neurons in the hidden layer and do the same permutation on the weights of the adjacent layers then the loss doesn't change. Hence if there is a non-zero global minima as a function of weights, then it can't be unique since the permutation of weights gives another minima. Hence the function is not convex.