Timeline for Why does hypothesis testing using coefficient and odds ratio give different conclusion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2015 at 18:21 | comment | added | Heisenberg | It seems like the inference with odds ratio is simply copied from the log odds ratio (note how the z score is exactly the same), whereas the odds ratio SE is calculated with delta method. I was misled by a Stata page that claims odds ratio inference is done using odds ratio SE> | |
| Apr 6, 2015 at 23:25 | comment | added | Marquis de Carabas | @Heisenberg, the standard errors are different for log odds and OR in the output I posted because they have been exponentiated for the OR. I have always assumed that significance was determined using LR test in Stata for the log odds. I think that is what Maarten mentioned above? | |
| Apr 6, 2015 at 19:30 | comment | added | Heisenberg | @AndyW It looks similar, but mpg's standard error is different for log odds ratio and odds ratio. | |
| Apr 6, 2015 at 6:55 | comment | added | Heisenberg | Thank you for your help. My question is more about how these softwares calculate the standard error and p-value under the hood | |
| Apr 6, 2015 at 6:12 | history | answered | Marquis de Carabas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |