Timeline for How to respond to reviewers asking for p-values in bayesian multilevel model?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 at 3:43 | history | edited | stijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adding some positive outcome from following the advice in the answer.
|
| Apr 29, 2015 at 0:29 | vote | accept | stijn | ||
| Apr 28, 2015 at 14:36 | answer | added | conjugateprior | timeline score: 16 | |
| Apr 28, 2015 at 12:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/593028951506812929 | ||
| Apr 28, 2015 at 9:50 | comment | added | stijn | That is so obvious I had not even thought about it. The model has some complications (weakly informative priors, some missing values on the explanatory variables) which makes it fairly difficult to run a frequentist version but I will think about reporting a stripped down model with the frequentist p-values. | |
| Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 | comment | added | Stéphane Laurent | Maybe the reviewer is asking for the usual frequentist p-values, independently of your Bayesian model ? | |
| Apr 28, 2015 at 9:11 | history | asked | stijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |