N_TC P_TC P_B P_Val P_Fun N_TC N_B N_Val N_Fun 565 430 144 100 186 135 45 30 60 489 378 98 130 150 111 37 25 49 659 562 230 190 142 97 32 33 32 370 263 90 87 86 107 36 36 35 452 351 117 130 104 101 37 34 30 289 173 60 57 56 116 39 30 47 490 340 115 120 105 100 33 30 36 475 355 120 110 125 120 40 35 45 520 400 149 153 98 120 30 50 40
N_TC P_TC P_B P_Val P_Fun N_TC N_B N_Val N_Fun
565 430 144 100 186 135 45 30 60
489 378 98 130 150 111 37 25 49
659 562 230 190 142 97 32 33 32
370 263 90 87 86 107 36 36 35
452 351 117 130 104 101 37 34 30
289 173 60 57 56 116 39 30 47
490 340 115 120 105 100 33 30 36
475 355 120 110 125 120 40 35 45
520 400 149 153 98 120 30 50 40
Following are the steps i have followed. t_design<-read.csv("/home/appsadmin/analytics/T_design.csv",header=TRUE,sep=",") m1<-lm(N_TC~P_TC+P_B+P_Val+P_Fun+N_TC+N_B+N_Val+N_Fun,data=t_design) m11<-lm( N_TC~P_TC+N_TC+N_B+N_Val+N_Fun,data=test_design_prod) # Removed some predictors as they have very low correlation. c1<-predict(m11,interval = "confidence") c1 fit lwr upr 1 565 565 565 2 489 489 489 3 659 659 659 4 370 370 370 5 452 452 452 6 289 289 289 7 490 490 490 8 475 475 475 9 520 520 520.
t_design<-read.csv("/home/appsadmin/analytics/T_design.csv",header=TRUE,sep=",")
m1<-lm(N_TC~P_TC+P_B+P_Val+P_Fun+N_TC+N_B+N_Val+N_Fun,data=t_design)
m11<-lm( N_TC~P_TC+N_TC+N_B+N_Val+N_Fun,data=test_design_prod) # Removed some predictors as they have very low correlation.
c1<-predict(m11,interval = "confidence")
And the output
c1
fit lwr upr
1 565 565 565
2 489 489 489
3 659 659 659
4 370 370 370
5 452 452 452
6 289 289 289
7 490 490 490
8 475 475 475
9 520 520 520.